"Applies various theories of knowledge to information science. Emphasis on identifying practices that information services such as libraries can adopt to facilitate the acquisition of knowledge."
Epistemology is the study of knowledge. Basically, epistemology is concerned with how it is that people know what they know. Work in epistemology has typically focused on how individuals working alone acquire knowledge about the world. However, in the past few decades, researchers have been looking at how people acquire knowledge in a social context. Social epistemology is concerned, for example, with how a person acquires knowledge from other people. But why should social epistemology be of interest to library and information professionals?
Note: One clue that it might be of interest is that the term social epistemology was first used by two library scientists: Jesse Shera and Margaret Egan of the Graduate Library School at the University of Chicago.
When someone goes to a library or surfs the Internet for information, s/he typically wants to acquire some knowledge. Information professionals try to facilitate this acquisition of knowledge. Librarians want the patron to be better informed when s/he leaves the library than when s/he arrived. (In fact, this is arguably the sine qua non of libraries.) Social epistemology is concerned with how we can go about acheiving this goal. In other words, it is concerned with identifying those practices that best facilitate the acquisition of knowledge (see, e.g., Goldman 1999 and Shera 1961).
In the first part of this course, we will survey some of the current theoretical work in social epistemology. Next, we will look at several practical applications of social epistemology to information science (e.g., in the areas of collection management, reference work, access to information, and the Internet). We will look at practices that the producers and disseminators of information are in a position to implement and we will try to determine how well these practices foster the acquisition of knowledge from recorded information.
Technical Prerequisites:
Students taking this course will need to satisfy the standard SIRLS technical requirements. In addition, several assignments in this course require students to create web pages. Furthermore, at least one assignment requires students to create a web page and post it on the web. Tips for doing this will be posted in D2L. Please contact the instructor if you have questions about these prerequisites.
Course Format:
This course will be taught virtually using a D2L course on the Web. Enrolled students will be given accounts by the start of the semester.
Note: Information about using D2L is available at http://www.sir.arizona.edu/resources/computing.html#d2l. If you have trouble with D2L, you can contact the D2L Support Staff (d2l@email.arizona.edu). (In addition, you can contact the SIRLS "D2L GAT" for the emester.) Send the D2L staff an email message explaining exactly what is
happening.
I plan to post one lecture per week. I plan to post these lectures on Wednesday afternoon or evening. So, you should find them posted in the "Content" area of the D2L course by the following morning.
I will set up a discussion forum for each lecture. Online discussions of the content of the course will take place in these forums. The participation requirement for this course requires active participation in these discussions. Lectures will typically conclude with a few possible discussion questions. You should have something thoughtful to say (a question, a comment, a reply, etc.) every week or so. But in order to stay up-to-date on discussions and announcements, you should check into D2L every day or so.
Note: The last day of classes this semester is em>December 5th. This will be the last official day for participation. However, D2L hould still be accessible for at least a couple of weeks after that point. I will still be checking in on the discussions and you are free to continue posting to the discussion forums.
I have a couple of small requests with regard to the discussion forums. These forums will be our main mode of communication in this course. In order to keep this communication more or less organized, I will set up different forums for different purposes. For example, in addition to a forum for each lecture, I will also set up a "Greetings" forum for you to describe who you are and why you are taking this particular course. So, my first request is that you try to direct your comments to the appropriate forum. My second request is that you use D2L email, instead of the forums, for any personal correspondence.
Note: If I need to communicate with you directly, I will typically send you a D2L email message. So, in addition to regularly checking the discussion forums, you need to regularly check your D2L email account (or you need to have your D2L email forwarded to your regular email account).
By the end of this course, students will:
- know the various ways in which libraries and other information services can affect people's ability to acquire knowledge.
- understand the main theories and concepts in the field of social epistemology.
- be able to use these theories and concepts to evaluate policies in libraries and other information services.
There is no required text to buy. However, the following book on social epistemology is highly recommended:
- Goldman, Alvin. 1999. Knowledge in a Social World. New York: Oxford University Press.
The required readings for this course (which are subject to modification) will all be available electronically. Some readings will be on the web. Other readings are in journals that can be accessed online through UA Library. (You will need a CatCard number to access these readings.) Still other readings (viz., those below which do not have links) will be available through electronic reserves. (The password will be distributed in D2L.)
Social Epistemology and Information Science
- Shera, Jesse. 1970. "Library and Knowledge." Pp. 82-110 in Sociological Foundations of Librarianship. New York: Asia Publishing House.
- Shera, Jesse. 1961. "Social Epistemology, General Semantics, and Librarianship." Wilson Library Bulletin 35:767-70.
- Furner, Jonathan. 2002. "Shera's Social Epistemology Recast As Psychological Bibliology." Social Epistemology 16:5-22.
The Objectives of Information Services
- Hamburg, M., Ramist, L. E., and Bommer, M. R. W. 1972. "Library Objectives and Performance Measures and Their Use in Decision Making." Library Quarterly 42:107-28 (especially pages 107 to 115).
Epistemology
- Steup, Matthias. "The Analysis of Knowledge." Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (especially sections 1 and 2).
- Descartes, Rene. "Of the Things Which May Be Brought Within the Sphere of the Doubtful." Meditations On First Philosophy.
Social Epistemology
- Goldman, Alvin. "Social Epistemology." Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
- Bloor, David. 1976. "The Strong Programme in the Sociology of Knowledge." Pp. 1-19 in Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Worries about Applying Epistemology to Information Science
- Popper, Karl. 1972. "Epistemology Without a Knowing Subject." Chapter 3 of Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford (especially pages 106 to 117).
- Harding, Sandra. 1992. "After the Neutrality Ideal: Science, Politics, and "Strong Objectivity"." Social Research 59:567-87.
Epistemic Objectives
- Thagard, Paul. 1997. "Internet Epistemology: Contributions of New Information Technologies to Scientific Research."
- Paterson, R. W. K. 1979. "Towards an Axiology of Knowledge." Journal of Philosophy of Education 13:91-100.
Applications of Epistemology to Information Science
- Goldman, Alvin. 1999. "The Technology and Economics of Communication." Chapter 6 of Knowledge in a Social World (especially pages 161 to 182).
- Meola, Marc. 2000. Review of Knowledge in a Social World by Alvin I. Goldman. College and Research Libraries 61:173-74.
Wikipedia
- Denning, Peter, Jim Horning, David Parnas, and Lauren Weinstein. 2005. "Wikipedia Risks." Communications of the ACM 48:152-52.
- Giles, Jim. 2005. "Internet Encyclopaedias Go Head to Head." Nature 438:900-901.
- Magnus, P. D. 2006. "Epistemology and the Wikipedia."
- Meyer, Bertrand. 2006. "Defense and Illustration of Wikipedia."
Information Ethics and Epistemology
- Goldman, Alvin. 1999. "Speech Regulation and the Marketplace of Ideas." Chapter 7 of Knowledge in a Social World (especially pages 189 to 194 and pages 209 to 217).
- Goldman, Alvin. 2000. "Reply to Fallis." Social Epistemology 14:331-32.
- McDowell, Ashley. 2002. "Trust and Information: The Role of Trust in the Social Epistemology of Information Science." Social Epistemology 16:51-63.
Other Recommended Readings
- Atkinson, Ross. 1996. "Library Functions, Scholarly Communication, and the Foundation of the Digital Library: Laying Claim to the Control Zone." Library Quarterly 66:239-65.
- Mill, John S. "Of the Liberty of Thought and Discussion." On Liberty.
- Fallis, Don. 2004. "Epistemic Value Theory and Information Ethics." Minds and Machines 14:101-17.
- Fallis, Don. 2006. "Social Epistemology and Information Science." Pp. 475-519 in the Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, vol. 40, ed. Blaise Cronin. Medford, New Jersey: Information Today.
- Any of the articles in the special issue of Social Epistemology (2002, vol. 16, no. 1) on "Social Epistemology and Information Science."
There are five components that go into the final course grade:
Requirement Percentage of Final Grade Participation 15% Midterm 20% Group Presentation 25% Application Project 25% Short Assignments 15%
Participation is discussed above under Course Format.
The Midterm will consist of a few essay questions (and probably a few short answer questions) that cover the lectures, readings, and discussions. It will be posted on a Wednesday in the middle of the semester in lieu of a lecture. The midterm will be due one week after it is assigned (i.e., the following Wednesday).
Note: All of the assignments in this course (including the midterm) will be due at 11:59pm Tucson time. I don't plan to start grading them at midnight; I just want to be sure that I have them in my hands when I get up the following morning. By the way, Tucson is always on Mountain Standard Time (MST).
The Group Presentation requires each of you to participate in creating an online presentation on a topic within the scope of social epistemology and information science. These presentations will take place during the last few weeks of the semester. Each group will sign up for a specific date to put their presentation online. We will treat the presentations like any other virtual lecture. For instance, I will set up a forum for each presentation, presentations will be required reading, etc.
Note: I do understand that group presentations, especially in a virtual course, present certain difficulties. Please let me know if you are having any problems.
The Application Project requires you to propose and discuss a possible application of social epistemology to information science.
A few Short Assignments will be assigned during the course of the semester.
Further details about these assignments (including due dates) will be provided in D2L. All assignments must be submitted as HTML or PDF files. Information about creating HTML documents is available at:
http://www.sir.arizona.edu/resources/computing.html#html.
Academic Code of Integrity
Students are expected to abide by The University of Arizona Code of Academic Integrity. 'The guiding principle of academic integrity is that a student's submitted work must be the student's own.' If you have any questions regarding what is acceptable practice under this Code, please ask an Instructor.
Accommodating Disabilities
The University has a Disability Resource Center. If you anticipate the need for reasonable accommodations to meet the requirements of this course, you must register with the Disability Resource Center and request that the DRC send me, the Instructor, official notification of your accommodation needs as soon as possible. Please plan to meet with me by appointment or during office hours to discuss accommodations and how my course requirements and activities may impact your ability to fully participate.
Assignment Policies
Further details about turning in assignments will be posted in D2L.
Incompletes
The 1997-8 University of Arizona General Academic Manual, p.23 reads
The grade of I may be awarded only at the end of a semester, when all but a minor portion of the course work has been satisfactorily completed. The grade of I is not to be awarded when the student is expected to repeat the course; in such a case the grade of E must be assigned. Students should make arrangements with the instructor to receive an incompete grade before the end of the semester ...
If the incomplete is not removed by the instructor within one year, the I grade will revert to a failing grade.
| Final Grade | Overall Percentage Score |
| A | 90% and above |
| B | 80% to 89% |
| C | 70% to 79% |
| D | 60% to 69% |
| E | 59% and below |
Each assignment will be graded on a point system. For example, you might receive 17 out of a possible 20 points on your Application Project. At the end of the course, the points received on each of the five components will be aggregated (using the percentages given above under Course Requirements) to yield an overall percentage score. Students with scores of 90% and above will receive an A, those with scores between 80% and 89% will receive a B, those with scores between 70% and 79% will receive a C, etc. Further details about the grading of assignments will be posted in D2L.
Office: SIRLS 14
Office Hours: Tuesdays 11:00am to 12:30pm and by appointment.
Telephone: 621-3565
D2L email: fallis at d2l dot arizona dot edu
Regular email: fallis at email dot arizona dot edu
If you have questions for me about the course, post a message to the D2L discussion forums or send a message to my D2L email account. (I prefer that you not use my regular email account for questions about the course.) In addition, if you are going to be in Tucson, you can come to my office hours or set up an appointment.

