The electronic portfolios (ePortfolios) demonstrate professional, academic, and personal progress toward a Masters Degree in Library and Information Science.
The ePortfolios consist of private collections of reflections and artifacts. They are part of the assessment of a student within SIRLS. They are private between the student and an evaluator. The evaluator will judge whether each reflection is satisfactory or not. And the student will need to produce 4 satisfactory reflections, as detailed below, to meet the School's ePortfolio requirement.
last altered 5/1/07
The electronic portfolios (ePortfolios) demonstrate professional, academic, and personal progress toward a Masters Degree in Library and Information Science.
The ePortfolios consist of two components a) a private collection of reflections and artifacts (known as the 'competency ePortfolio' or the 'reflections'), and b) a public collection of artifacts and narrative that might serve to showcase a student's knowledge, learning, and experience to future employers and others (known as the 'professional ePortfolio').
The reflections are part of the assessment of a student within SIRLS. They are private between the student and an evaluator. The evaluator will judge whether each reflection is satisfactory or not. And the student will need to produce 4 satisfactory reflections, as detailed below, to meet the School's ePortfolio requirement.
The public showcase of a student's work and abilities is not assessed (although the evaluator, the student's advisor, and other members of faculty, will be available to assist the student in producing a public professional ePortfolio of quality). The public showcase will be maintained, and be accessible, on the School's servers for as long as the student wishes (and policy and resources permit). The professional ePortfolio will also be editable throughout its life.
Reflections are detailed narratives in which students self-evaluate and consider their learning.
The SIRLS Master's Degree focusses on 10 competencies. Self-reflections are an analytical tool organized around these 10 competencies. They help students provide an overview of what the students have learned. They give evidence of a clear understanding of various topics, issues, challenges, and procedures in LIS. Self reflections also give insights into decision-making and examples of how information learned in courses would apply to information specialists. The reflections illustrate the development of competencies at various stages in the degree program (i.e. foundation course level, mid-program, and final reflection). Reflections describe how coursework, professional development, activities, internships, and other learning experiences prepare a student for a career as a librarian or information specialist. Through reflections, students demonstrate their intellectual development and their understanding and knowledge of subject content.
Within the infrastructure used here to support reflections, reflections can have attachments (rather like email, familiar to all) and reflections can also link with their body to other documents, images, spreadsheets, etc. Thus, a reflection can have associated artifacts. And there is often benefit in providing associated artifacts. For example, in a reflection a student may discuss how a particular paper that the student wrote for a particular course gave them special insight, in which case it would be very natural either to attach that paper to the reflection or to link to it.
Artifacts might be written papers, power point presentations, images, bibliographies, links to web pages, etc. Students, ie you, do not create artifacts here and now for the purpose of your ePortfolio. Rather, you produce artifacts for your courses, as part and parcel of your studies as you journey through the School. You may also encounter artifacts in your professional development activities or your readings. Then, as you self assess, you reflect, in part, on those artifacts. (Librarians would say that the artifacts are the data, and the reflections are the meta-data.)
This reflection indicates the deep learning that has occurred during the foundations class. It is not a summary of what has been learned, but a narrative that demonstrates the depth of understanding of the content presented during the course. The self-reflection presents your personal views of topics covered in the course and discusses how and why you developed these views. It gives insights into your personal learning through the course content. It should be tied to the appropriate competencies.
The mid-program reflection will occur when a student has completed half the coursework. This reflection should be substantive, describing the courses the student has taken and ways the coursework has begun to shape the student's understanding of library and information science at mid point of the degree. The mid-program reflection should also describe how the coursework, and other learning experiences outside the classroom, have contributed to progress toward specific competencies.
This reflection indicates the learning that has occurred during a professional development activity (such as attending a research presentation or an AZLA meeting). Such a reflection is not a summary or mere description of the activity, but a narrative that demonstrates the depth of understanding of the significance and value of the activity.
The final self reflection is a comprehensive, well organized and clearly written essay about a student's learning experiences at SIRLS. The student will have completed 36 hours of coursework in library and information science. Therefore, the essay should include a discussion about learning experiences, challenges, and statements about the student's understanding of the field. This reflection should be a clear indication of the student's preparation as a professional. Final reflections should also document that the student meets the entire list of program competencies.
The 504 reflection is done as an assignment in the 504 course
The Mid-program reflection is due the semester in which 18 credits are completed.
Please note this is also the time students' Plans of Study (POS) are due.
The professional activity reflection may be done at any time, but it needs to be completed before the final reflection is assessed.
The final reflection must be submitted by the following dates:
If graduating in Spring, the final reflection is due by April 1st.
If graduating in Fall, the final reflection is due by Nov. 1st.
If graduating in Summer, the final reflection is due by July 1st.
Completion of Degree Requirement forms will not be certified until the final reflection has been completed satisfactorily.
Students are encouraged to prepare a Professional e-Portfolio. Its role for those seeking new employment or promotion is similar to that of a CV. The goal of the Professional e-Portfolio is to present an academic picture of you to a potential employer and to document your professional development through the SIRLS program.
There is much flexibility as to the form of a professional ePortfolio. Essentially the student is free to create as they wish. We will be providing certain templates and samples, which students may adapt or use (these are not ready as of May 2007).
5/9/07
As a library and information professional, you will need to be skilled at assessing your own learning and identifying additional things you need to know. We expect students, as they progress through SIRLS, to move from dependence on faculty assessment of their achievements to a realistic self-assessment of achievement. The competency reflections are the tools and opportunities for you to monitor your own learning and augment it as you see the need.
Each reflection itself will be evaluated as it is posted. The evaluation here will either be 'acceptable' or 'in need of revision'. [If a reflection needs revision, the evaluator will usually suggest what needs to be done. ]
The competency reflections as a whole, will be formally reviewed at two points.
On the posting of a mid-Program reflection, which should occur after the student has completed 18 units of study, a student's Competency ePortfolio will be reviewed for the following:
On the posting of the final reflection, which should occur early in your final semester, your ePortfolio will be reviewed for the following items:
When a student's ePortfolio is complete, and to the required standard, the evaluator will sign off on it.
June 08 IRLS504 Movie View this, it is very helpful!
[May 07 IRLS504 Movie -- old perhaps of only historic interest]
This is a website, with User accounts and 'roles'. What a person can see and do depends on whether they have an account and what role they have.
[The movies shown here depict an earlier version of this site, It has a slightly different look or 'theme' to this one, and also with slightly different menus and functionality. But all the principles are the same.]
A member of the public does not need an account. This what they can do
[Public Role above is a Quicktime movie, which you should be able to see and play straight off. If you cannot, your browser should detect what it is and tell you what you have to do to see it (to download a plug-in, or whatever). If you have a really old browser, or one somewhat out of the mainstream, none of the above might happen. In which case you need to go to Quicktime or Quicktime download and equip your machine for viewing Quicktime. The help files are in Quicktime, so you will need this capability.]
A student does need an account, and they need to log in, then they can do everything 'public' can do, and more. (For an explanation of the the 'public' role, check the section above).
This is what they can do
A new student is a slightly watered down version of a student, in particular new students cannot blog (they can only reflect). The thought here is just that the whole system should be as simple as possible for complete newcomers. Once a new student is comfortable with the environment, their account and their role will be converted to that of 'student'.]
An evaluator also needs an account, and to log in, then they can do everything 'student' and 'public' can do, and more. (For explanations of the 'public' and 'student' roles, check the sections above).
This is what evaluators can do
3/13/2008
May 07 IRLS504 Movie We change the layout and 'theme' from time to time, so some of the colors etc. may be different in the video to what you would see now. All the underlying principles are the same, though.




The uploading of attachments is restricted in two ways: a) by file size (which is presently set at 2 megs) and b) by file suffix (which is presently set to any of jpg jpeg gif png txt html htm doc xls pdf ppt pps odt zip). So if you try to upload your 3 meg myPhDThesis.doc or your 1 meg movie myHoliday.mov, neither will work. 2 megs is pretty big, and we thought it enough, but it might not be for some power point presentations (you could compress them first before uploading). We may set this larger if that seems appropriate (and also we could change the suffixes is that seems required).
When html files are attached and uploaded, the System adds the suffix '.txt' as a security fix, so myHomePage.html becomes myHomePage.html.txt. This is unsatisfactory for linking to.
Basically we/theCMS cannot allow the User to run arbitrary html as black hat hackers could compromise the system. However, you can paste any html you like into a reflection (because then when you hit Submit we run it through a filter and remove any suspect stuff). We should, of course, run attachments through the same filter (but that is a code level modification). If you have a bunch of links, paste them into the body of the reflection itself (and paste your essay in as well). Just put a heading at the bottom 'My essay' and paste it in.
This is not overly satisfactory, but we are trying to make the best of a bad job here.
The system here is similar to that of email and attachments. Say you are off on your vacation, and, from Internet Cafés, you send a series of emails to your friends and on each one you attach one or more pictures of you sunning yourself, enjoying the Bodlean, etc. The pictures are, in a sense, artifacts, and the emails to some degree are reflections on those pictures (and the events they depict). And, perhaps you would like records of this for yourself to see later and to show to others whose addresses you have forgotten, so you send copies to yourself at home.
Then, on return, someone asks you 'where do the pictures go?', 'how do you manage the pictures?, 'can you forward to me some of the emails and their associated pictures?' 'Can you send me the pictures of you on the big dipper?'.
Well, you start looking through your copies of the sent mail, and you find the relevant email(s). Fortunately the pictures of interest, are for the most part attached to the emails where they belong. So far so good. But then Aunt Thelma asks you to send all the holiday photos of the baby but no photo that has Homer in it. Now you are in trouble, because those photos are attached to different emails, and you don't want all of them.
At this point, with older computer styles of working, you might create yourself a directory or folder, extract all the photos from all the emails and put them in it. Then start searching through that folder for photos of baby etc.
We are not going to do anything like that last step. This present ePortfolio system we are all using sits on a database. Now the database holds all the files, reflections, artifacts, everything, and manages them for us. What it provides for us are addresses of everything. This is no mystery to us librarians. The addresses are a surrogate for the files just exactly as catalog cards can be a surrogate for books on a shelf. All our work is going to be with the surrogates; all we are going to care about is addresses not files (catalog cards not books).
When you write and publish a reflection, you upload (and thus attach) any relevant artifacts to it. And the Content Management System (CMS) in return gives you addresses for those artifacts. Good, the artifacts are 'with' the reflection they relate to.
However, just like the vacation pictures, there are occasions when you might want all the artifacts or all of the artifacts that do not relate to Homer. In other words, you want to cross from reflection to reflection gathering. As stated, it is tricky.
But, hey, we are librarians, we organize things. Clearly what we need to do is to organize the addresses of the artifacts. What we could do, is to start a page called Artifacts, and put all the addresses of the artifacts on it, and also arrange them (artifacts relating to 506, artifacts from my first year, etc.). All of this is good, apart from we don't have an obvious way of producing this index or jump page (and it itself is obviously not a reflection). So here is a suggestion. Every one of you has your own reflections home page within the CMS. If your netID is 'jsmith' that page is called 'jsmithReflections', and that home page automatically links to all of your reflections (have a look and see). Also you can edit it. So why not start a paragraph or section on it called 'My artifact collection' and then just put there the links (addresses) to all your artifacts. You could also put a few words with those links (like meta tags or cataloging information eg links not about Homer).
In sum, attach each artifact to the reflection it relates to (and note the artifacts address). Then click on your group homepage <yourNetIDHere>Reflections, click on the Edit tab, paste in the address and any text you want to add, hit 'Submit'.
So Where do the artifacts go?; answer their addresses go on the relevant reflection and centrally on your home page.
You do not have to put your files on a server before attaching them. You just click File attachments, Browse (and find what you want on your computer), Attach, then scroll down and click 'Submit'. [This last bit is a little strange, but it arises because no edit is considered permanent until you 'Submit' it.]. There is no server you are going to. You do not need SSH clients or similar.
This is explained here.
When created, reflections are private and can be seen only by members of the relevant groups (ie the student and the evaluators). However, sometimes for some purposes, a student might want a reflection to be public. And sometimes students inadvertently make a reflection public (not easy to do). This movie shows how to make reflections public or private, or change from one to the other.
[These are becoming slightly dated as of May 2007, but there may still be some points of interest in them.]
Given to the SIRLS-LSO meeting Sept 18 06
http://www.sir.arizona.edu/faculty/fricke/ePortfolio/ePortfolioTalkSept1806.htm
-----------
Given to the incoming IRLS504 July 06.
http://www.sir.arizona.edu/faculty/fricke/ePortfolio/FrickeePortfolio.htm
As of May 2008, Sara Hayden is the SIRLS ePortfolio graduate assistant sehayden@email.arizona.edu. And Tom Wilding is the main evaluator wilding@email.arizona.edu